Active Learning
Science of Learning
STEM Education

No Pain, No Brain Gain: Why Students Still Need a Little Struggle

Jonny Zivku
Jonny Zivku
Director, Product Marketing

For as long as there has been education technology, it has chased the same goal: make learning easier. Remove friction. Deliver answers faster. And in many ways, it has succeeded. Today’s students have instant feedback, step-by-step walkthroughs, video explanations for almost any concept, and AI tutors that can answer a question in seconds. These tools are extraordinary. But they raise a curious question: if learning becomes too easy, what happens to the learning itself? Learning science has an answer: productive struggle, and the desirable difficulties that make it work.

Easy Come, Easy Go

Across every domain where people build real expertise (mathematics, engineering, music, athletics), the pattern is the same. Expertise comes from practice: repeated attempts, mistakes, revision and gradual improvement. Not just exposure. Not just explanation. Cognitive science backs this up. As the influential book Make It Stick summarizes, learning that feels easy is often surprisingly fragile. Students feel confident in the moment, but the knowledge fades fast. Researchers call the fix desirable difficulties: retrieving information instead of rereading it, spacing practice over time instead of cramming, and working problems in varied contexts instead of repeating identical examples. Each adds a little friction, and that effort is exactly what makes understanding stick. (We dug into the memory side of this in The Forgetting Curve.)

The Paradox of Productive Struggle

Many learning tools aim to remove precisely the kind of difficulty that makes learning durable. Hand a student the full solution the moment they hesitate, and you may also hand away the thinking. That doesn’t make technology the villain. The most promising tools support productive struggle: they guide without giving everything away, encourage experimentation, and give feedback while still letting learners wrestle with the idea. That’s the thinking behind Möbius. Randomized, algorithmic questions mean students can’t simply memorize an answer; they get fresh versions of a problem for retrieval practice spread out over the term. Adaptive questions and targeted hints nudge students forward one step at a time, and Möbius’s math engine recognizes any mathematically equivalent answer, so students can work a problem their own way instead of guessing at the “expected” format.

Thinking Takes Effort

Because the goal of education isn’t completing tasks. It’s learning to think, and thinking takes effort. The moments that shape understanding most are often the ones that took persistence: the problem that didn’t click at first, the idea you came back to, the slow realization that something once confusing now makes sense. Want to see how Möbius builds productive struggle and desirable difficulties into everyday practice? Book a personalized demo with our team.

We adopted this article from Episode 8, Season 1 of The EdTech Curio Cabinet podcast, hosted by Christina, the Curio Steward. Listen to the full episode here, where you’ll also find plenty more curios to explore, or find it wherever you get your podcasts.

DigitalEd